Key Points
News thrives off of attention, as
does social media. Connective media platforms and news share a similar
foundation built on the importance of sharing, but more so, they both gain
pleasure from the attention of others. When a news article is popular, the
media outlet, author, or organization benefits from readership and potential
profitability. Social media operates similarly operating and really depending
on a user’s desire for attention. To a social media user, posting a photo of
their new baby is the same as a news channel posting an article. The more
involvement as in the more attention a story gets, the more media is spurred.
Take the death of Michael
Brown for example. The media was fueled by audience participation. There
are still other instances of shootings involving minorities and police officers,
however this story took off with media attention through involvement.
References
The broader popularity of
celebrities in the news serves as an example. TMZ, celebrity magazines, and
other tabloids of outlets of entertainment news hold a high status in the world
of news and social media. A recent Vise
article regarding disputes between tabloids and celebrities accounts how
celebrities are fighting against tabloids via connective media platforms to
post their own stories, their own narrative, their own news. The narratives
produced by tabloids only exist because we demand them. They keep supplying,
and we keep demanding with the one caveat that now the demand is broadened
through the direct involvement of celebrities. With the invention of connective
media platforms, the growth of entertainment news has only increased. The
media, regardless of channel, demand involvement. Mainstream media with the
addition of connective media platforms has raised indirect involvement from the
audience but lowered direct involvement. Celebrities no longer get involved
behind the scenes, instead they just post directly to their social media
accounts.
Similarly, citizens no longer have
to fight for policy, they can blog indirectly about it from home. The media demands involvement. With
the incorporation of connective media, the audience can take a seat and be
involved from a keyboard and mouse. I believe that connective media platforms are keeping us
from actually being involved in the news. We sit back and type from our
computers. Hide behind tweets and instagrams hoping real change will grow
overnight. In Dave
Meslin’s Ted
Talk: The Antidote to Apathy, Meslin asserts that the role as media as
developed so has our relationship to political change. He references the
election race, similarly to how in class we have discussed the challenges in
participation of the election as it is viewed as a horse race. The news with
connective media prompts no immediate action. The most amount of participation occurs
when a user shares an article on Facebook. Connective media platforms have
helped keep us on our computers instead of on the sidewalks.
Class Image
Questions
1. Do you think news through connective media platforms is responsible for a decline in civic engagement? Why or why not?
2. What role does advertising with connective media platforms play in regards to news stories and placement?
Sources
Sources
No comments:
Post a Comment